Canada: Eroding Freedoms

Two stories via Persecuted Church:

Hutterite colony loses battle over photo ID

Yesterday (July 24, 2009) the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that all driver’s licences in Alberta must require photo ID regardless of one’s religious beliefs. After hearing the appeal by members of the Wilson Hutterite Colony more than nine months ago, the Supreme Court of Canada delivered a close 4-3 judgment to uphold Alberta rules requiring a digital photo for all new licences. Some Hutterite sects, however, believe the second commandment forbidding idolatry prohibits them from willingly having their photograph taken.

Saskatchewan marriage commissioner loses appeal

Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Janet McMurty has upheld the ruling of the human rights tribunal that marriage commissioner, Orville Nichols did not have the right to refuse to marry a same-sex couple in April 2004 on basis of his personal Christian beliefs. The tribunal had also ordered Nichols to pay the complainant (a man identified only as M.J.) $2,500 in compensation.

Nichols had appealed the May 23, 2009 ruling, arguing that his religious beliefs should be protected under Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. McMurty dismissed his argument, however, in her 39-page ruling today, concluding that the human rights tribunal was “correct in its finding that the commission had established discrimination and that accommodation of Mr. Nichols’ religious beliefs was not required.”

The Hutterite story is of particular interest to me since their historical roots are Anabaptist, just like mine.

Don’t Be So Negative!

When the law says, “Do not kill,” is it presenting a negative or a positive?

Come now, that isn’t such a difficult question, is it? I mean, you see that not there, right? So that makes it a negative law.

Maybe; maybe not.

Interestingly, I’ve never heard anyone complaining about that law, “Oh, there you go being negative again. You just like to tell people what they can’t or shouldn’t do. Why can’t you be more positive? All this negativity is bad. Lighten up!” No, people don’t respond to “Do not kill” that way.

Do you know why not?

Because they realize that if that law keeps a potential killer from killing them, that law is extremely positive. In other words, they see a positive personal benefit in a “negative” law.

Now think of some other “negative” Biblical commands. For example:

  • “Thou shalt not commit adultery” (Exodus 20:14).
  • “Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth” (Matthew 6:19).
  • “Speak not evil one of another” (James 4:11).

You won’t have to think for long before seeing that these are extremely positive despite sounding negative. Don’t allow anyone to mislead you!

(originally written in mid-2001 and posted here: Liberty, Not License)

Can You Explain My Mail?

Well, not my mail, but something that came in my mail.

Is there anything lacking in this focus?

Is there anything lacking in that focus?

(Or maybe the more pertinent questions is, is there anything lacking in my life focus?)

How do they operate in the red like that?

How do they operate in the red like that?

(Or maybe the more pertinent question is, how do I operate in the red?)

And, no, I won’t reveal the name of the organization whose newsletter I scanned for the above images (which you may feel free to click for a larger version).

I look forward to your explanations….

Private
Above all, love God!