Bright Atheists

World MagBlog reports:

Today, some 5 million Americans claim to be atheists — and they’re coming out of the closet.

Quoting from a linked-to article:

As a result, atheists allege a whole host of slights, hostility, and civil-rights violations. And so many atheists are trying to do what homosexuals did when they pulled off one of the biggest public-relations coups in history, in part by rebranding themselves as “gay.” Atheists are calling themselves “brights.”

Brights.

Whaddayaknow.

Whatever the case, I’d rather not mock them for their efforts at rebranding.

I would rather many atheists come to BeRight in their views of God and in their relationships with God.

BeRight — another way of pronouncing bright. (I made it up all by myself.)

James Hansen on Global Temperatures

The Berean Call reports:

Did NASA scientist James Hansen, the global warming alarmist in chief, once believe we were headed for . . . an ice age? An old Washington Post story indicates he did.

On July 9, 1971, the Post published a story headlined “U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming.” It told of a prediction by NASA and Columbia University scientist S.I. Rasool. The culprit: man’s use of fossil fuels.

The Post reported that Rasool, writing in Science, argued that in “the next 50 years” fine dust that humans discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun’s rays that the Earth’s average temperature could fall by six degrees.

Sustained emissions over five to 10 years, Rasool claimed, “could be sufficient to trigger an ice age.”

Aiding Rasool’s research, the Post reported, was a “computer program developed by Dr. James Hansen,” who was, according to his resume, a Columbia University research associate at the time.

So what about those greenhouse gases that man pumps into the skies? Weren’t they worried about them causing a greenhouse effect that would heat the planet, as Hansen, Al Gore and a host of others so fervently believe today?

[…]

Hansen has some explaining to do. The public deserves to know how he was converted from an apparent believer in a coming ice age who had no worries about greenhouse gas emissions to a global warming fear monger.

This is a man, as Lockwood noted in his message to the Times’ John McCaslin, who has called those skeptical of his global warming theory “court jesters.” We wonder: What choice words did he have for those who were skeptical of the ice age theory in 1971?

People can change their positions based on new information or by taking a closer or more open-minded look at what is already known. There’s nothing wrong with a reversal or modification of views as long as it is arrived at honestly.

TBC ends with this footnote:

[TBC: We have been criticized for occasionally running stories addressing Global Warming. In view of the political, and more importantly, religious elements that drive this movement, this is an area needing watchfulness. Further, revelations that James Hansen received $720,000 in 2006 from leftist George Soros might be an indication that scientific consensus has a price.]

Frozen Earth: The Once and Future Story of Ice Ages         21st Century Environmental Threat: A New Ice Age? Global Warming at the Tipping Point  Climate Change Research (Two CD-ROM Set)

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming (and Environmentalism)         Is the Temperature Rising? The Uncertain Science of Global Warming

A No-Spin Savage Rush

So this afternoon I listened to Michael Savage for a while.

And caught on he was on tear (rhymes with air) after being attacked by the San Fransisco Board of Supervisors (or whatever they’re called).

Then I thought, “Rush Limbaugh was on a tear this morning about being attacked by the Congress.”

And, “Wasn’t it last week Bill O’Reily was also under attack for something he said?”

That all seems too coincidental to me.

How soon will it be Sean Hannity and/or Mark Levin and/or Dennis Prager and/or Lars Larson and/or Larry Elder and/or Laura Ingraham?

WiFi, Coffee, Herbs

I’ve been at this place!

A Molalla Internet cafe operator signed an agreement with the Oregon Attorney General’s Office that prohibits him from practicing medicine without a license.

Ralph D. “Dan” Mitchell treated clients at his clinic, Greenhouse Health & Wellness Center, using unproven therapies such as ion foot baths and a galvanic skin response device, the Attorney General’s Office said. The clinic shares space with a coffeehouse and Internet cafe.

I used to go there for WiFi access.

I’ve drunk their coffee and their smoothies.

And eaten their pastries.

Nice place. Nice people.

NASA Aims

Everybody take cover!

No, no, I don’t really mean that.

Here’s the full headline:

NASA aims to put man on Mars by 2037:

NASA aims to put a man on Mars by 2037, the administrator of the US space agency indicated here Monday.

Ahoy, NASA! Please aim for 2017. That gives you a whole ten years. And if you miss by ten years, you’d still be ten years ahead of the above schedule.

Besides, in 2037 I would be 78, if I’m still here. I’d rather be younger.

I think.

My Computer, My Personal?

Microsoft updates Windows without users’ consent

Microsoft has begun patching files on Windows XP and Vista without users’ knowledge, even when the users have turned off auto-updates.

[…]

In recent days, Windows Update (WU) started altering files on users’ systems without displaying any dialog box to request permission. The only files that have been reportedly altered to date are nine small executables on XP and nine on Vista that are used by WU itself. Microsoft is patching these files silently, even if auto-updates have been disabled on a particular PC.

It’s surprising that these files can be changed without the user’s knowledge. The Automatic Updates dialog box in the Control Panel can be set to prevent updates from being installed automatically. However, with Microsoft’s latest stealth move, updates to the WU executables seem to be installed regardless of the settings — without notifying users.

When users launch Windows Update, Microsoft’s online service can check the version of its executables on the PC and update them if necessary. What’s unusual is that people are reporting changes in these files although WU wasn’t authorized to install anything.

If my personal computer is that accessible to Microsoft for this particular purpose, how accessible is it to them for other purposes?

And how accessible to others for other purposes?

How about your personal computer?

Important Lesson: Beware of the personal stuff you keep on your personal computer — it all may not be so personal and private as we may have assumed.

By the way, should McAfee protect me from such unauthorized intrusions as Microsoft’s?

Mismatched

Does anybody care?

Norwegian and British fighter jets were scrambled to intercept Russian bombers over the north Atlantic, the latest in a series of such incidents, Norway’s military command said Friday.

Two Russian Tupolev-160 bombers or “Blackjacks” were detected by the NATO allies flying along the Norwegian coast before passing by northern Scotland, a military spokesman told AFP.

“We dispatched two F-16s from Bodoe airbase (in the north of Norway) to identify them,” Lieutenant-Colonel Jon Inge Oegland said, adding that Britain had also sent aircraft.

bomber and fighter

More questions . . . .

Is that truly an F-16?

Would a “fight” between these two aircraft be “fair”?

If you ignore the blackjacks will they go away?

Will we hear next that it was carrying nukes by mistake?

Above all, love God!